The changing nature of procurement

Stuart Thomson, public affairs consultant, and Dougal Ainsley, solicitor at Bircham Dyson Bell discuss the changing face of the procurement process

It has been reported that Jon Cruddas, the Labour Party Policy Coordinator, wants to bring in revolutionary measures that will “strip companies of government contracts”. But what he really appeared to be considering was a potentially significant but evolutionary change to the way that procurement is undertaken.

The coverage was based on Cruddas’ essay in ‘Blue Labour: Forging a New Politics’. Cruddas’ contribution is largely blue skies thinking rather than detailed policy prescription. It suggests, for instance, that:
“Labour’s politics of the common good requires … no more outsourcing of relational services to those parts of the private sector that are driven purely by corporate profit rather than a social purpose. It is quite staggering that some £10 billion of public contracts – of taxpayers’ money – are allocated to some 20 private companies. Rather, we need to forge cooperative ties with ethical enterprise – such as cooperatives, mutuals, and social businesses.”

The coverage prompted a response from the CBI warning against “damaging rhetoric” and emphasising the contribution of the public services industry to the economy. There is no doubt that many existing relationships prove beneficial to both sides but Cruddas’ comments suggest that a different type of procurement competition could be on the way.

It is a stretch to see his words as leading to the removal of existing contracts from companies. Indeed, Cruddas appears comfortable with outsourcing. To the extent that he is proposing any sort of a change, he seems to want to widen the range of organisations which are involved in the outsourced delivery of public services, and proposing that those organisations (including companies) should pursue social objectives.

Cruddas’ comments leave plenty of room for speculation but it seems existing contracts would remain in place; from the date of implementation of the policy, contracts only would be awarded to organisations that contribute to social objectives.

To a certain extent, this is what already happens. Businesses are required to meet social purposes in a number of ways. For example, it is a social objective to make new buildings more energy efficient. This is required by law through building regulations. Builders therefore contribute to these objectives, whether or not they are involved in a public contract.

In addition, many firms already have a developed corporate social responsibility programme. That is part of their current offer under the current arrangement.

The proposals are in line with other recent developments in the relationship between public bodies and the companies that they contract to deliver services.

For example, the contracts offered for Crossrail were considered a real shift in the way procurements worked. They were heralded as “responsible procurement” by the then Secretary of State for Transport, Justine Greening. The emphasis was ensuring that bidders set out how they would engage with their supply chain, provide opportunities for training and apprenticeships and for small and medium-sized businesses in their own procurement strategies.

Since then we have also seen the passing of the Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012. The Act “requires people who commission, or buy, public services to consider securing added economic, social or environmental benefits for their local area.” The public body designs the contract so the business is bound to deliver the benefits.

More recently, the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 came into force on 26 February. The have been designed to secure increased quality and value for money for contracting authorities, and seek to do this by making public procurement more accessible to SMEs and voluntary organisations – exactly the kind of organisation more likely to be motivated by social ends that Cruddas has in mind.

So this points to a clear direction of travel where politicians, in essence, want businesses through the procurement process to help deliver social and policy outcomes. Simplistically, it is a quid pro quo for being paid large amounts of taxpayers’ money.

Seen in this light, the proposals can be seen as the latest suggestion in an ongoing process. They are designed to encourage ‘normal’ businesses to up their game on social contribution and for ‘alternative’ businesses to up their game (or be assisted) in bidding for public service contracts against their more commercially adept rivals. If implemented, they could be expected to have a gradual cultural effect, rather than instant and dramatic consequences. They are similar in objective to many recent policy initiatives and legislative changes.

So rather than Cruddas the revolutionary, we are really looking at Cruddas the evolutionary.

Your News

If you've got a story that would be of interest to Builder & Engineer readers, send us an email


2017-05-31 13:33

The rate of Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) will rise by two per cent on June 1 to 12 per cent on all non-exempt transactions. Martin Bennison, managing director at construction finance firm Ultimate Finance, explains what this means for UK construction companies.

2017-05-25 08:41

Building Information Modelling (BIM) is growing in popularity and is now mandatory for centrally funded public-sector projects. Experts and the curious are gathering more and more frequently at dedicated congresses, exhibitions and workshops. Many people are now asking: Where does the UK stand on the issue of BIM and the digitisation of the construction industry?

2017-05-10 10:47

Opening site doors to more females is vital to plugging the construction skills gap, reports Claire Cameron

THE construction industry continues to be plagued by a well-documented skills gap with some suggesting the shortage could get worse before it gets better.

2017-05-08 14:27

If you work on a building site, are self-employed or have a zero-hours contract, you might be surprised to know you work in the ”gig economy”. This is the economy characterised by temporary work and irregular hours, pay and working conditions.

2017-03-29 10:31

Jeremy Gould, VP sales Europe, TomTom Telematics, discusses how technological developments in vehicle telematics have opened up new workflow management possibilities for the construction industry

2017-03-21 09:31

With the demand of oil increasing, it’s estimated that the Earth will reach its full capacity for oil consumption at some point within the next 20 years. This is despite the production of oil decreasing, and the construction industry is no exception to this, reports Niftylift.

2017-03-17 10:55

With construction firms leading the way in drone technology, Claire Cameron takes a closer look at how unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can be used onsite

2017-03-07 16:20

While the physical safety of workers is prioritised on construction sites, mental health is often overlooked, reports Claire Cameron

Free E-newsletter Sign-Up

Sign up for our free e-newsletter

Looking for a company or service?